A Whole-Class Self-Assessment Method to Enhance Engagement with Feedback in Low-stakes, High-value Assessments in the Physical Sciences

David John McGarvey, Laura M Hancock

Abstract


A readily implementable and effective whole-class face-to-face tutor-led student self-assessment method for enhancing engagement with feedback is described and discussed. Key features of the approach are the transfer of responsibility for writing feedback information from teachers to students within a tutor-led face-to-face dialogic feedback session, and students’ self-penned feedback annotations being distinguished from their original work by use of a distinctly coloured pen. Results of a student evaluation are reported and reveal that students perceive this approach as beneficial to their engagement with feedback, their assessment literacy and learning of chemistry.


Keywords


self-assessment; assessment literacy; feedback engagement; feedback recipience; assessment for learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaumont C., O’Doherty M. & Shannon L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning?, Studies in Higher Education, 36, 671–687. DOI: 10.1080/03075071003731135

Blair, A., Wyburn-Powell, A., Goodwin, M. & Shields, S (2014) Can dialogue help to improve feedback on examinations?, Studies in Higher Education, 39,1039-1054. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2013.777404.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Carless D. & Boud D. (2018), ‘The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 1315-1325. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.

Chanock, K. (2000) Comments on essays: do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 95–105. DOI: 10.1080/135625100114984.

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education. A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. DOI: 10.1080/03075079912331379935

Gibbs, G., & C. Simpson. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1, 3–31.

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430. DOI: 10.3102/00346543059004395

Harris, L.R., & Brown, G.T.L. (2013). ‘Opportunities and Obstacles to Consider When Using Peer- and Self-assessment to Improve Student Learning: Case Studies into Teachers’ Implementation.’ Teaching and Teacher Education 36: 101–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008

Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2001) Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback, Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 269–274.

Higher Education Funding Council for England (2017). 2017 National Student Survey Summary Data. Available online at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/2017

(accessed 20th February 2018). DOI: 10.1080/13562510120045230

Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In: David Boud and Elizabeth Molloy, eds. Feedback in Higher and Professional Education. Abingdon: Routledge, 11–33.

Nash, R.A. & Winstone, N.E. (2017) Responsibility-Sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback. Frontiers in Psychology 8, Article 1519. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519

Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.

O’Donovan, B., Price, M. & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education 9, 325–35. DOI: 10.1080/1356251042000216642

O’Donovan, B.M., den Outer, B., Price, M. & Lloyd, A. (2019). What makes good feedback good?, Studies in Higher Education. DOI:10.1080/03075079.2019.1630812.

Panadero, E., Brown, G.T.L., & Courtney, M.G.R. (2014). Teachers’ reasons for using self-assessment: a survey self-report of Spanish teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 365–383. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5

Panadero, E., Brown, G.T.L., & Strijbos, J.W. (2016). The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803-830. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2

Peterson, E.R., & Irving, S.E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001

Rand, J. (2017). Misunderstandings and mismatches: The collective disillusionment of written summative assessment feedback. Research in Education, 97, 33-48. DOI: 10.1177/0034523717697519

Smith, C.D., Worsfold, K. ,Davies, L. , Fisher, R. & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students’ assessment literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 44–60. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018) Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76, 467-281. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 379–394. DOI: 10.1080/02602930500353061

Williams D.P., Lo Fan Hin S., & Erlina (2019). First-Year Undergraduate Student Expectations of two UK Chemistry Degree Programmes. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 14. DOI: 10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.3047

Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Parker, M. & Rowntree, J. (2017a). Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist, 52, 17–37. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017b). It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it’: barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 2026–2041. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032

Yang M. & Carless D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285–297. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.3223

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences

eISSN: 2753-4138

University Home