The Application of Bloom’s Taxonomy to Higher Education Examination Questions in Physics

Samantha Louise Pugh, Jessica Gates

Abstract


Examination papers were analysed using a methodology based on Bloom’s Taxonomy to identify the cognitive skills required to complete questions and compare these to the cognition necessary for graduate skills. This research found that examinations access mainly mid to low-level cognition such as recall and apply, while competencies required by employers tend to need higher-level cognition such as synthesis and creation, which are not as commonly tested through examinations. This paper proposes that careful design of examination questions using different measurable verbs could be more effective at encouraging development of higher-level metacognitive skills in formal examinations.


Keywords


Physics; Exams; Bloom's Taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bates, S.P., Galloway, R.K., Riise, J. & Homer, D. (2014) Assessing the Quality of a Student-Generated Question Repository. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 10, no. 2 (July 18, 2014): 020105. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020105.

Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H. & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Clark, D. (2005) Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains: The Affective Domain. http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html (Accessed 29/04/2021)

Darma, I.K., Candiasa, I.M., Sadia, I.W. & Dantes, N. (2018) The Effect of Problem Based Learning Model and Authentic Assessment on Mathematical Problem Solving Ability by Using Numeric Ability as the Covariable. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1040 June: 012035. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1040/1/012035

Ene, E. & Ackerson, B.J. (2018) Assessing Learning in Small Sized Physics Courses. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14, no. 1, January: UNSP 010102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010102

Entwistle, N. & Entwistle, A, (1992) Experiences of Understanding in Revising for Degree Examinations, Volume 2, Issue 1, March, pp. 1-22. DOI: 10.1016/0959-4752(92)90002-4

Fernandez, F.B. (2017) Action Research in the Physics Classroom: The Impact of Authentic, Inquiry Based Learning or Instruction on the Learning of Thermal Physics. Asia-Pacific Science Education 3, no. 1, December. DOI: 10.1186/s41029-017-0014-z

Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (2003) A Handbook For Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, Second Edition.

Hanson, S, & Overton, T. (2010) Skills required by new physics graduates and their development in degree programmes. Higher Education Academy UK Physical Sciences Centre.

Institute of Directors (2007) Institute of Directors skills briefing – December, Graduates’ employability skills. 116 Pall Mall, London SW1Y 5ED.

Institute of Physics (2010), The Physics Degree: Graduate Skills Base and the Core of Physics https://www.abdn.ac.uk/careers/resources/documents/4581.pdf (accessed 23/5/2021)

Krathwohl, D.R. (2002) A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice 41, no. 4, pp.212–18. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Laverty, J.T. & Caballero, M.D. (2018) Analysis of the Most Common Concept Inventories in Physics: What Are We Assessing? Physical Review Physics Education Research 14, no. 1 April: 010123. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010123.

Momsen, J., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Montplaisir, L., Anderson, E. & Grosz, N. (2013) Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses. CBE life sciences education vol. 12, 2, pp. 239-49. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.12-08-0130

Pearce, S. (2016) Authentic Learning: What, Why and How? E-Teaching: Management Strategies for the Classroom. Australian Council for Educational Leaders, April, Vol. 10, http://www.acel.org.au/acel/ACEL_docs/Publications/e-Teaching/2016/e-Teaching_2016_10.pdf (Accessed 29/04/2021)

Pugh (2019) Rethinking University Assessment by Learning from Secondary Education, University of Leeds, https://teachingexcellence.leeds.ac.uk/teaching-enhancement-projects-current/samantha-pugh-school-of-physics-and-astronomy/

Rustaman, N. Y. (2017) Assessment in Science Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 895 (September 2017) 012141. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012141

Stanny, C.J. (2016) Re-evaluating Bloom’s Taxonomy: What Measurable Verbs Can and Cannot Say about Student Learning. Education Sciences 6, December. DOI: 10.3390/educsci6040037

Sikorski, T-R. & Hammer, D. (2017) Looking for Coherence in Science Curriculum. Science Education 101, no. 6, November, pp. 929–43. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21299

Stobaugh, R. (2013) Scenarios and Real World Applications. Assessing critical thinking in middle and high schools: Meeting the common core, Chapter 4, Routledge, ISBN 9781315853451.

Sugiarti, T., Kaniawati, I. & Aviyanti, L. (2017). Development of Assessment Instrument of Critical Thinking in Physics at Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 812, February, 012018. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012018

The Quality Assurance Agency (2017) The QAA Benchmark Statement for Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-physics-astronomy-and-astrophysics.pdf?sfvrsn=eff3c881_4 (Accessed 24/04/2021).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i16.3674

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
We use both functional and performance cookies to improve visitor experience. Continue browsing if you are happy to accept cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.
OK


New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences

eISSN: 2051-3615