Student-Posed Quecture Questions Can Engage First-in-Family Students with Meaningful Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtns.vi19.4700Keywords:
First-in-Family to University, Personalised Learning, Student-Generated QuestioningAbstract
Students in their first semester at university were asked to pose their own questions, known as quecture questions, for each learning topic. This was as part of their weekly preparation for flipped lectures on two parallel compulsory biology courses. Quecture questions are intended to engage students, particularly those with educational disadvantages who may be unfamiliar with effective learning strategies, in meaningful concept-based learning. The mechanism of posting the questions differed between the two courses in that a forced sequence tool on the virtual learning environment required students to post something on the online board on one course while students could opt not to post on the online board on the other course. Small focus groups and qualitative analysis showed that the students realised both cognitive and metacognitive learning benefits from the quecture strategy. Students that were first-in-family to Higher Education were prioritised as focus group attendees and, although adjustment to the quecture strategy was judged to be more difficult within this group, positive learning benefits were discerned for all these students. The pressure to engage within one course was, on balance, considered to be useful for nudging students towards more effortful engagement with their learning. In this way cognitive and metacognitive benefits were recognised for first-in-family students.
References
Adu, P. (2019). A Step-By-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding, Taylor & Francis Group. ProQuest Ebook Central. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ed/detail.action?docID=5747025
Allen, D. and Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex, Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 262–268.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1305885/
Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E. and Weiss, M. (2009). Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology, CBE Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 203–213.
https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1964-10399-000
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Canning, E. A., White, M. and Davis, W. B. (2024). Growth Mindset Messages from Instructors Improve Academic Performance Among First-Generation College Students, CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(2), 1-9.
https://www.lifescied.org/doi/full/10.1187/cbe.23-07-0131
Cevikbas, M. and Kaiser, G. (2022). ‘Promoting personalized learning in flipped classrooms: A systematic review study’, Sustainability, 14(18),11393.
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11393
Chin, C. and Brown, D. E. (2002), 'Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science', International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095249
Cottone, A. M. and Yoon, S. (2020). Improving the design of undergraduate biology courses toward the goal of retention: The case of real-world inquiry and active learning through metagenomics, Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.1965
Coryell, J. E., Baumgartner, L. and Bohonos, J. W. (2024). Methods for facilitating adult learning: Strategies for enhancing instruction and instructor effectiveness. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ebersbach, M. (2020). Access to the learning material enhances learning by means of generating questions: Comparing open- and closed-book conditions, Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 19, 100130. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2211949320300065
Eddy, S. L. and Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111(23), 8410–8415.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D. and Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology, CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 132–139. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17548875/
Gavassa, S., Benabentos, R., Kravec, M., Collins, T. and Eddy, S. (2019). Closing the achievement gap in a large introductory course by balancing reduced in-person contact with increased course structure, CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(1), 1-10. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/full/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0153
Haak, D. C., Hillerislambers, J., Pitre, E. and Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology, Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1204820
King, A. (1991). ‘Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050404
King, A. (1992). ‘Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures’, American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163370
Ludvigsen, K., Ness, I. J and Timmis, S. (2019). ‘Writing on the wall: How the use of technology can open dialogical spaces in lectures’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 34, 100559. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118711830244X?via%3Dihub
McQueen, H. A., & McMillan, C. (2020). Quectures: Personalised constructive learning in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 217–231. Available at; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1469787418760325
McQueen, H.A. and Colegrave, N. (2022). Raising attainment for low-scoring students through quectures: an analysis of achievement and engagement with personalised learning in lectures, IJ STEM Ed, 9, 44.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00360-0
Nagle, B. and Williams, N. (2013). Methodology brief: Introduction to focus groups, Centre for Assessment, Planning and Accountability. http://www.mmgconnect.com/projects/userfiles/file/focusgroupbrief.pdf
Panksepp, J. (2011). The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: Do animals have affective lives? Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 35,1791– 1804. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149763411001497
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C. and Chapman, S. (1996). ‘Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies’, Review of Educational Research, 66(2),181. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.3102/00346543066002181
Song, D. (2016). Student-generated questioning and quality questions: a literature review, Res. J. Educ. Stud. Rev, 2, 58–70.
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03730-000
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S. and Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
Watson, L. (2018). Educating for Good Questioning: a Tool for Intellectual Virtues Education, Acta Analytica, 33(3), 353–370.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-018-0350-y.
Watson, L. (2021). Cultivating Curiosity at University: How Universities Fall Short of Aspiration. In: Mahon, Á. (eds) The Promise of the University. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives, 10. Springer, Singapore.