Breaking barriers, building community: improving student engagement with preparation for studying online multidisciplinary science by distance learning - a case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.3217Keywords:
Online community, Learning community, Building community, Transient, Asynchronous, Peer mentor, Distance learning, Blended learningAbstract
Developing an online learning community can help to improve student success. This presents a challenge as the student cohort is often time-limited and shifting in composition before a module starts. The continued evaluation and development of an online preparatory website for the new, year one module S112 - Science: concepts and practice is reported. Evaluation of the site in 2017-18 showed high levels of student satisfaction with the resources, though very little engagement with the asynchronous forum. Therefore, improvements before the October 2018 module start centred on increasing student engagement on the forum: Firstly, tutors moderating the forums were tasked with developing several optional scientific tasks for staged release to generate student discussion. Secondly, volunteer peer mentors from the 2017-18 presentation were recruited and trained as “student buddies” to provide non-academic advice and support.
Student engagement increased markedly prior to the October 2018 module. The clearest emergent theme from tutors who moderated the forums was that students were seeking to establish a study community, rather than obtain subject-specific advice. Student response to the buddies was positive, with students more willing to ask questions of the buddies than of the tutor moderators. Data for S112 show that registrations at module start increased by 23.5% from 2017 to 2018, and early withdrawals (14 days after module start) dropped by 2%.
Our results provide ideas for building online student engagement, particularly in scenarios where students may come and go, and have little available time: for example, bridging gaps in time or academic readiness, whether by blended or distance learning.
References
Chih-Hsiung, T., & Corry, M. (2003). Building Active Online Interaction via a Collaborative Learning Community. Computers in the Schools. 2003, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p51-59. 9p. DOI: 10.1300/J025v20n03_07
Collings, R., Swanson, V., & Watkins, R., (2014) The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration and retention: a controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. High Educ (2014) 68:927–942 DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9752-y
Cuthbertson, W. & Falcone, A. (2014). Elevating Engagement and Community in Online Courses, Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8:3-4, 216-224, DOI: 10.1080/1533290X.2014.945839
Fox, A., Stevenson, L., Connelly, P., Duff, A., & Dunlop, A. (2010) Peer-mentoring undergraduate accounting students: The influences on approach to learning and academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education 11(2) 145-156. DOI: 10.1177/1469787410365650
Glazer, H., Breslin, M. & Wanstreet, C.E. (2013). Online professional and academic learning communities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Fall 2013, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p123-130. 8p.
Heirdsfield, A.M., Walker, S., Walsh, K., and Wilss, L. (2008) Peer mentoring for first-year teacher education students: the mentors’ experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning Vol. 16, No. 2, May 2008, 109–124 DOI: 10.1080/13611260801916135
Lai, K. (2017). Pedagogical practices of NetNZ teachers for supporting online distance learners. Distance Education. Nov 2017, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p321-335. 15p. DOI:10.1080/01587919.2017.1371830
Menchaca, M.P. & Bekele, T. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education. Oct 2008, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p231-252. 22p. DOI:10.1080/01587910802395771
Moore, R.L. (2014). Importance of Developing Community in Distance Education Courses. TechTrends. March 2014, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 20–2. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-014-0733-x
Nye, A. (2015). Building an online academic learning community among undergraduate students. Distance Education, 36:1, 115-128. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1019969
O'Neill S., Scott, M. & Conboy, K. (2011). A Delphi study on collaborative learning in distance education: The faculty perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 42 No 6, 2011 939–949. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01132.x
Ortiz-Rodríguez, M., Telg, R.W., Irani, T., Roberts, T.G. & Rhoades, E. (2005). College students' perceptions of quality in distance education: The Importance of Communication. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Summer 2005, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p97-105. 9p.
Palloff, R.M & Pratt, K. (2007) Building Online Learning Communities: Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2007
Robson, J., Crabb, E. & Lotze, N. (2018a) “Evaluating different operating models of study buddy schemes – what works best for students?” Horizons in STEM: Making Connections, innovating and sharing pedagogy 2018, 28-29th June University of Hull
Robson, J., Wheeler, P. & Church, K. (2018b) “Peer mentoring schemes for Distance Learners; a successful working example from Environmental Science.” Horizons in STEM: Making Connections, innovating and sharing pedagogy 2018, 28-29th June University of Hull.
Ross, J., Gallagher, M. S., & Macleod, H. (2013). Making distance visible: Assembling nearness in an online distance learning programme. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1545
Sampaio, P.N.M., Teixeira, J.M., Camacho, M. F. & Gouveia, R. (2010) 'Blended Peer-Assisted Learning Platform: Improving Learning Outcomes with a Collaborative Environment', Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol 39, no. 4, pp. 371-395.
West, R.E. (2010) A Student’s Guide to Strengthening an Online Community. TechTrends, Volume 54, Number 5. Pp69-75. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-010-0439-7
Wilson, J.D., Cordry, S.A. & King, N. (2004). Building Learning Communities with Distance Learning Instruction. TechTrends Volume 48, Number 6, pp.20-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF02763577.
