Creating an online mathematics and statistics community of learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.2824Keywords:
Community of learners, Student ExperienceAbstract
There is an increasing focus within Higher Education on the wider student experience. Student engagement and a well-developed community are associated with greater levels of retention, student satisfaction and success. Whilst creating opportunities for students to engage with each other and staff may be easier in a face-to-face environment, the School of Mathematics and Statistics at The Open University has a long tradition of engaging distance learning students outside the ‘classroom’ environment. As the opportunities for face-to-face engagement have declined over time, the School has needed to adapt how this support is provided. One such initiative was to provide a subject forum with the specific remit of offering advice on module choice – the module advice forum. This paper shows how the forum fulfils a set of criteria which define a bounded learning community. Since its creation in the early 90’s the forum has flourished and now provides students with the opportunity to engage more fully in issues such as curriculum development and delivery of student support. The key to its success is the wide-ranging community which contributes, besides the students themselves: this includes academics, part-time tutors and advisory student support staff, who all have their ‘academic home’ in the School of Mathematics and Statistics. The forum is housed on a Study website which provides dedicated resources to which students are referred via the forum to answer specific questions regarding module choice at the appropriate point in their student journey.
References
Bamber, V. & Jones, A. (2014) Challenging students: Enabling inclusive learning. In Fry, H., Ketteridge S. & Marshall, S.A. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing academic practice, 152 168. Oxon: Routledge.
Coates, H. (2010) Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). Higher Education, 660, 1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-009-9281-2
Crosling, G., Thomas, L. & Heany, M. (2008) Improving Student Retention in Higher Education – The role of teaching and learning. London:Routledge.
Foster, E., Lawther, S., Keenan, C., Bates, N., Colley, B. & Lefever R. (2012) The HERE Project: Higher Education: Retention & Engagement. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
Hilliam, R. & Williams, G. (2019a) Academic and pastoral teams working in partnership to support distance learning students according to a curriculum area. Higher Education Pedagogies Journal, 4(1), 32-40. DOI: 10.1080/23752696.2019.1606674
Hilliam, R. & Arrowsmith, G. (2019b) Enhancing the student experience with the use of a dedicated subject website. MSOR Connections, 17(2), 39-45. DOI: 10.21100/msor.v17i2.947
Howson, C.B.K. (2014). Feedback to and from students: Building an ethos of student and staff engagement in teaching and learning. In Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S.A. Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing academic practice, 123-138. Oxon:Routledge
Kuh, G.D., Grace, T.M., Shoap, R., Kinzie, J. & Gonyeq, R.M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540 563. DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Price, M., Handley, K. & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback-focussing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879-896. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
Tinto, V. (2004) Student Retention and Graduation: Facing the Truth, Living with the Consequences. Occasional Paper 1. Washington DC: The Pell Institute.
Wells, P. (1999) Different and Equal: Fostering independent in a learning community. In Retallick, J., Cocklin, B. and Commbe, K. Learning Communities in Education: Issues, strategies and contexts. UK: London, Routledge.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, B.G., Ludwig-Hardman, S., Thornam, C.L. & Dunlap, J.C. (2004) Bounded Community: Designing and facilitating learning communities in formal courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(3). DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v5i3.204
Zhao, C. & Kuh, G.D. (2004). Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 115-138. DOI: 10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de
