“Collaborative” provenance research – About the (im)possibility of smashing colonial frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v18i1.3295Keywords:
postcolonial collaboration, power asymmetries, provenance research, decolonizationAbstract
This article aims to reflect on the aporias and paradoxes of a postcolonial, collaborative research approach to ethnographic collections dating from colonial times. While, at least in Germany, ‘provenance research’ and ‘collaboration’ have become politically opportune, important questions concerning the possibilities or impossibilities of overcoming colonial categories, epistemologies and imbalances of power remain to be answered. Based on research and collaboration with stakeholders over the course of two projects on the Tanzania collections of the Ethnologisches Museum Berlin, this article asks how far ‘collaboration’ and ‘decolonization’ risk remaining merely empty, fashionable phrases, if, on the one hand, today’s concern with the colonial context of collections in European museums seems to be to a great extent self-referential and avoiding radical criticism of today’s power asymmetries; and, on the other, the deconstruction of colonial class, gender, race, and ethnic categorizations, and of the resulting representations is hindered – if not made impossible – by the epistemologies implicit in the order of the collections themselves but also by identity politicsDownloads
Additional Files
Published
23.03.2020
How to Cite
Weber-Sinn, K., & Ivanov, P. (2020). “Collaborative” provenance research – About the (im)possibility of smashing colonial frameworks. Museum & Society, 18(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v18i1.3295
Issue
Section
Provenance research in German institutions
License
Copyright remains with the author(s) of the article. This article can be re-used according to the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence.