The relation between multi-cultural group work and the integration of home and international students

Gita Sedghi, Elisabeth Rushworth


Group working skills are essential attributes for graduates in higher education, and are highly valued by prospective employers of home and international students. With increasing numbers of international students, with different social, cultural, and academic backgrounds, there is an opportunity to evaluate the students’ perceptions of, and the potential benefits for, student integration in multi-cultural group work. The research measured students’ attitudes towards multi-cultural group activities compared with different aspects of group work in general. The opinions of students in two departments, Chemistry and Geography & Planning, towards multi-cultural group work were generally positive, although international students had a better perception of the benefits, and were more likely to self-assign themselves to mixed groups, than home students. International students found the cognitive benefits of culturally mixed groups, and their effect on enhancing integration, more favourable than home students. Conversely, home students have a better overall perception of the benefits of the emotional aspects of the group work, how they will manage the assignment, the development of interpersonal skills, and group assessment than international students. In general, the results imply that tutors should deliberately assign students to multi-culturally mixed groups to encourage integration, and that the academic tasks for the assignments should be developed sensitively to encourage engagement with both cohorts of students. 


Keywords: Internationalisation; Integration; Group work; Home; international


Internationalisation; Integration; Group work; Home; international

Full Text:



Andrich, David. (1978). Relationships between the Thurstone and Rasch approaches to item scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 451-462.


Baker, R.W. & Siryk, B. (1999). SACQ Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire. Los Angeles: Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

Baohua, Y. & Huizhong, S. (2012). Predicting roles of linguistic confidence, integrative motivation and second language proficiency on cross-cultural adaptation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 72-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.12.002

Bentley, Y. & Warwick, S. (2013). Students' experience and perceptions of group assignments. Paper presented at the HEA STEM Conference, Birmingham.

Bond, K. & Scudamore, R. (2010). Working with international students: A guide for staff in Engineering. HEA subject centre guide.

British Council. (2012). Student insight - China. Retrieved from British Council website:

British Council. (2015a). Is China creating a workforce with no soft skills? Retrieved from British Council website:

British Council. (2015b). Student insight - Brazil. Retrieved from British Council website:

British Council. (2015c). UK is top host of international students, but for how long? Retrieved from British Council website:

Carroll, J. (2002). Suggestions for teaching international students more effectively. Retrieved from Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development: learning and teaching briefing paper.

Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F. (1989). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. Biochemical Education, 17(3), 140-141.

Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F. (1999). Development and Adaptations of the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 75-81. DOI: 10.1002/tl.8006.

Coser, L.A. (1975). The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

De Vita, G. (2002). Does Assessed Multicultural Group Work really pull UK Students' Average down?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(2), 153-161. DOI: 10.1080/02602930220128724

Dolmans, D.H.J.M. & Schmidt, H.G. (2006). What Do We Know About Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Small Group Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11, 321-326. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-006-9012-8

Ennew, C. & Greenway, D. (2012). The Globalization of Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan.

Eva, H. & Roger, S. (2012). Representing diversity in education: Student identities in contexts of learning and instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2012.10.001

Gurin, P., Dey, E.L., Hurtado, S. & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes (English). Diversité et enseignement supérieur: théorie et impact sur les résultats scolaires (French), 72(3), 330-366.

Hardy, J., Bates, S.P., Casey, M.M., Galloway, K.W., Galloway, R.K., Kay, A.E. & McQueen, H.A. (2014). Student-Generated Content: Enhancing learning through sharing multiple-choice questions. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2180-2194. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2014.916831

HESA. (2015). The official source of data about UK universities and HE colleges. from Higher Education Statistics Agency

James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing group work. Assessing Learning in Australian Universities.

Jones, E. & Brown, S. (2007). Internationalising higher education. London: Routledge.

Kimmel, K. & Volet, S. (2010). Significance of context in university students' (meta)cognitions related to group work: A multi-layered, multi-dimensional and cultural approach. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 449-464. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.004

Kimmel, K. & Volet, S. (2012). University students' perceptions of and attitudes towards culturally diverse group work: Does context matter?. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(2), 157-181. DOI: 10.1177/1028315310373833

Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodelled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in ILinked-in1nternational education, 8, 5-31.

Kramsch, C. (2002). In search of the intercultural. Review of Jandt, F. E., Intercultural Communication: An Introduction. 3rd edition.; Young Yun Kim. Becoming Intercultural: An Integrative Theory of Communication And Cross-Cultural Adaptation.; Tony Schirato and Susan Yell. Communication And Culture: An Introduction; Ron Scollon and Suzanne Wong Scollon. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. 2nd Edition. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 275-285.

Kriflic, L. & Mullan, J. (2007). Strategies to improve student reaction to group work. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 4(1).

Liou-Mark, J., Dreyfuss, A.E. & Younge, L. (2010). Peer assisted learning workshops in precalculus: an approach to increasing student success. Mathematics & Computer Education, 44(3), 249-259.

Mannan, M.A. (2007). Student attrition and academic and social integration: Application of Tinto's model at the University of Papua New Guinea. Higher Education, 53(2), 147-165. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-005-2496-y

Marjan, L., & Seyed Mohammad, G. (2011). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091

Montgomery, C. (2010). Understanding the international student experience: Palgrave Macmillan.

Nicol, D. (2007). E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53-64.

Popov, V., Brinkman, D., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., Noroozi, O. & Kuznetsov, A. (2012). Multicultural student group work in higher education. An explorative case study on challenges as perceived by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(2), 302-317.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004

Rienties, B., Beausaert, S., Grohnert, T., Niemantsverdriet, S., & Kommers, P. (2012). Understanding academic performance of international students: The role of ethnicity, academic and social integration. Higher Education, 63(6), 685-700. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9468-1

Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2008). Students' attitudes towards culturally mixed groups on international campuses: Impact of participation in diverse and non-diverse groups. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 357-370. DOI: 10.1080/03075070802211430

Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2010). Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: evidence from observations and self-reports, 473.

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.

UKCISA. (2015). International students statistics

Umans, T. (2011). Globalisation in the lecture room? Gender and cultural diversity in work groups. Issues in Educational Research, 21(1), 88-103.

UUK. (2014). International students in higher education: The UK and its competition. Retrieved from:

Vitaliy, P., Dine, B., Harm, J. A. B., Martin, M., Andrei, K., & Omid, N. (2012). Multicultural student group work in higher education. An explorative case study on challenges as perceived by students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 302-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.09.004

Volet, S. (2001). Student motivation: The culture and context of learning: Springer US.

Volet, S. E., & Ang, G. (1998). Culturally mixed groups in international campuses: An opportunity for intercultural leaning. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(1), 5-23.

Watson, W. E., Johnson, L., Kumar, K., & Critelli, J. (1998). Process gain and process loss: Comparing interpersonal processes and performance of culturally diverse and non-diverse teams across time. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(4), 409-430.

Willis, I., & Sedghi, G. (2014). Perceptions and experiences of home students involved in welcoming and supporting direct entry 2nd year international students. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 2-17.

Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2009). Interface of personal content goals with social direction and motivational patterns in collaborative learning contexts. Paper presented at the EARLI-Conference, Amsterdam.

Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2012). Group heterogeneity and homogeneity in personal content goals for a group learning activity: Impact on individual appraisals. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61(4), 585-604. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00507.x


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
We use both functional and performance cookies to improve visitor experience. Continue browsing if you are happy to accept cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.

New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences

eISSN: 2753-4138

University Home