Feedback for Future Learning: Delivering Enhancements and Evidencing Impacts on the Student Learning Experience

Kevan Michael Andrew Gartland, Angela Shapiro, Lesley McAleavy, Jamie McDermott, Alison Nimmo, Melanie Armstrong


Enhancing the student learning experience through the provision of improved student feedback is both challenging and complex. ‘Feedback for Future Learning’ was a Glasgow Caledonian University(GCU)-wide project intended to enhance feedback practices from both the student and staff perspectives; to ensure greater awareness of, and reflection upon, feedback by students; and to encourage greater use of feedback to inform future student learning. The design, implementation and evaluation of approaches to ‘Feedback for Future Learning’ are described with an emphasis on STEM disciplines. The conceptualisation, design and implementation of a range of student feedback tools and approaches aimed to develop understanding of learning processes, reinforce learning and improve performance. This was achieved through collaboration with the GCU Students’ Association and the establishment of the University Feedback Enhancement Group. A series of generic and bespoke seminars, workshops, individual programme interventions and competitions were used to enhance comprehension of the perception, experience and use of formative and summative assessment feedback by students.   Providing opportunities for reflection and evaluation together with qualitative and quantitative metrics have demonstrated 93% satisfaction with student feedback enhancement workshops, a trebling of engagement with memorable feedback survey initiatives and a 9% increase in National Student Survey assessment and feedback satisfaction. A 16% rise in student satisfaction with the promptness of feedback, a 14% improvement in satisfaction with the detailed comments received and an 8% increase in satisfaction with the helpfulness of comments received were achieved. The lessons learned inform the continuing and sustainable enhancement of the student learning experience for STEM students and the wider University community. 

Keywords: Feedback, future learning, dialogue, engagement, reflection, enhancement


Feedback; future learning; dialogue; engagement; reflection; enhancement

Full Text:



Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M. & Shannon, L. (2011) Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education 36(6): 671-687. DOI:10.1080/03075071003731135.

Broadwell, M.N. (1969) Teaching for learning. The Gospel Guardian 20: 1-3a.

Clouder, L. (1998). Getting the ‘Right Answers’: student evaluation as a reflection of intellectual development? Teaching in Higher Education. 3(2), pp. 185-195. DOI:10.1080/1356215980030205.

de Bono, E. (1995) Serious creativity. Journal of Quality and Participation 18: 12-18.

Gartland, K.M.A., Armstrong, M., McAleavy, L., McDermott, J., Shapiro, A. (2015) Feedback for Future Learning. Enhancement Themes Conference, QAA Scotland.

Gibbs, G. (1988) ‘Learning by doing: a guide to learning and teaching methods’, Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic, Oxford.

Glasgow Caledonian University (2015) Annual Financial Statement, 2014-15.

Glasgow Caledonian University (2016) Feedback for Future Learning Resources.

Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., Litjens, J. (2008) The quality of guidance and feedback to students. Higher Education Research and Development 27: 55-67. DOI: 10.1080/07294360701658765.

National Union of Students (2009) The great feedback amnesty. NUS HE Focus 1.

Nicol, D. (2010) From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback in mass higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35: 501-517. DOI:10.1080/02602931003786559.

Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006) “Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2):199-218. DOI:10.1080/03075070600572090.

Porter, S.R. and Whitcomb, M.E. (2005) Non-response in student surveys: The role of demographics, engagement and personality. Research in Higher Education 46(2): 127-152. DOI:10.1007/s11162-004-1597-2.

Porter, S.R., Whitcomb, M.E. and Weitzer, W.H. (2004) Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research 121:63-73. DOI:10.1002/ir.101.

Scott, J., Shields, C., Gardner, J., Hancock, A., Nutt, A. (2011) Student engagement with feedback. Bioscience Education 18-5. DOI:10.3108/beej.18.5SE

Shapiro, A. and Johnston, A. (2010) From Workshop to Vidcasts: Reflections on Students’ Learning'. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 2(3): 244-251. ISBN-978-3-642-13165-3.

Shapiro, A. and Johnston A. (2011) Bridging the feedback divide utilising inclusive technologies. In: ECEL, ed. 10th European Conference on e-Learning, University of Brighton. University of Brighton, pp.821-825.

Traxler, J. (2008) Podcasting in context. In: Simon, G. and Edirisingha, P. (Eds.) Podcasting for learning in UK universities. McGraw-Hill Education pp. 12-19. ISBN-10 0 335 23429.

Vivyan, C. (2010) The Helicopter View. Get Self-Help Company.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
We use both functional and performance cookies to improve visitor experience. Continue browsing if you are happy to accept cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.

New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences

eISSN: 2051-3615