Email this article Gender balance and impact of role models in secondary science education
Abstract
Exposure to inspirational and relatable role models is crucial towards fostering engagement of learners with scientific disciplines. However, the representation of scientists in popular culture is still far from being adequately gender- and race-inclusive. This study evaluated the gender balance and impact of scientific role models using a two-pronged experimental approach. The gender balance was investigated in search engines, online databases, and school curricula. A survey was used to investigate English secondary students’ awareness of role models and intentions to pursue further scientific studies.
Our findings revealed a widespread female underrepresentation amongst scientific role models in all the analysed online sources and in high school curricula provided by the three main English exam boards. The survey (n = 356) revealed that students were considerably more likely to identify famous male than female scientists. While awareness of female role models was significantly associated with students’ gender, this was not the case for male role models. A statistically significant correlation was also observed between the number of identified role models and intentions to pursue scientific studies in Key Stage 4 girls.
This study reinforces the urgency of ensuring school curricula and online resources provide a more modern and inclusive representation of scientists.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Avolio, B., Chavez, J., & Vilchez-Roman, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: a literature review. Social Psychology of Education. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-020-09558-y
Blažev, M., Karabegović, M., Burušić, J., & Selimbegović, L. (2017). Predicting gender-STEM stereotyped beliefs among boys and girls from prior school achievement and interest in STEM school subjects. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 831-847. DOI: 10.1007/s11218-017-9397-7
Boaler, J., Altendorff, L., & Kent, G. (2011). Mathematics and science inequalities in the United Kingdom: when elitism, sexism and culture collide. Oxfood Review of Education. (4), 457. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2011.595551
Cannady, M.A., Greenwald, E., & Harris, K.N. (2014). Problematizing the STEM Pipeline Metaphor: Is the STEM Pipeline Metaphor Serving Our Students and the STEM Workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443-460. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21108
Carrington, B., Tymms, P., & Merrell, C. (2008). Role Models, School Improvement and the 'Gender Gap'—Do Men Bring out the Best in Boys and Women the Best in Girls? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 315-327. DOI: 10.1080/01411920701532202
Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic Images of the Scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265. DOI: 10.1002/sce.3730670213
Conner, L.D.C. & Danielson, J. (2016). Scientist Role Models in the Classroom: How Important Is Gender Matching? International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 2414-2430. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1246780
Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231-246. DOI: 10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313
Earley, P.C., & Kanfer, R. (1985). The influence of component participation and role models on goal acceptance, goal satisfaction, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 378-390. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(85)90006-8
Egalite, A.J., Kisida, B. & Winters, M.A. (2015). Representation in the classroom: The effect of own-race teachers on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 45, 44-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.01.007
European Institute for Gender Equality. (2017). Economic benefits of gender equality in the EU
How gender equality in STEM education leads to economic growth.
Fort, D.C. & Varney, H.L. (1989). How Students See Scientists: Mostly Male, Mostly White, And Mostly Benevolent. Science and Children, 26(8), 8-13.
González-Pérez, S., Mateos de Cabo, R. & Sáinz, M. (2020). Girls in STEM: Is It a Female Role-Model Thing? Frontiers in Psychology, 11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02204
Higher Education Statistics Agency. (2020). What do HE students study? Retrieved 18/06/2021 from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/what-study
Hyde, J.S., Mertz, J.E. & Schekman, R. (2009). Gender, Culture, and Mathematics Performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(22), 8801-8807. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901265106
Lockwood, P. (2006). "Someone Like Me Can Be Successful": Do College Students Need Same-gender Role Models? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 36-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00260.x
Lockwood, P. & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and Me: Predicting the Impact of Role Models on the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91–103. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91
Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B. & Herzog, W. (2019). The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: The Impact of the Gender Stereotype of Math and Science on Secondary Students' Career Aspirations. Frontiers in Education, 4. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00060
Marx, D.M. & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1183-1193. DOI: 10.1177%2F01461672022812004
Miller, D.I., Nolla, K.M., Eagly, A.H. & Uttal, D.H. (2018). The Development of Children's Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies. Child Development, 89(6), 1943-1955. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13039
Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M.K. & Peters, K. (2015). The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants' goals. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 465-483. DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000059
Penner, A.M. & Paret, M. (2008). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research, 37(1), 239-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.012
Porter, C. & Serra, D. (2020). Gender differences in the choice of major: The importance of female role models. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(3), 226-254. DOI: 10.1257/app.20180426
Potvin, P., Hasni, A., Sy, O. & Riopel, M. (2020). Two Crucial Years of Science and Technology Schooling: A Longitudinal Study of the Major Influences on and Interactions between Self-Concept, Interest, and the Intention to Pursue S&T. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 1739-1761. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-018-9751-6
Royal Society of Chemistry. (2018). Breaking the Barriers Women’s retention and progression in the chemical science.
Scherz, Z. & Oren, M. (2006). How to Change Students' Images of Science and Technology. Science Education, 90(6), 965-985. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20159
Shirazi, S. (2017). Student Experience of School Science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1891-1912. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1356943
Siani, A. & Dacin, C. (2018). An Evaluation of Gender Bias and Pupils' Attitude towards STEM Disciplines in the Transition between Compulsory and Voluntary Schooling. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 13(1), n1. DOI: 10.29311/ndtps.v0i13.2966
Siani, A., Marley, S.A., Smith, C. & Donnelly, J. (2020). Gender and parental education as indicators of students’ engagement with STEM subjects. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 12(2).
Steinke, J. & Paniagua Tavarez, P. M. (2017). Cultural Representations of Gender and STEM: Portrayals of Female STEM Characters in Popular Films 2002-2014. International Journal of Gender, Science & Technology, 9(3), 244.
Tan, A.L., Jocz, J.A. & Zhai, J. (2017). Spiderman and science: How students’ perceptions of scientists are shaped by popular media. Public Understanding of Science, 26(5), 520-530. DOI: 10.1177/0963662515615086
UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in STEM.
Wang, M.T. & Degol, J.L. (2017). Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review (1), 119. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i17.3939
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences
eISSN: 2753-4138