The impact of student timetables and commuting on student satisfaction

Nigel Page, Gary Forster-Wilkins, Mark Bonetzky

Abstract


Widening participation has encouraged students from a diverse range of backgrounds into university with more students commuting (many being Black and Minority Ethnic, BME). Since timetabling forms a major way by which students identify and interact with their learning environment understanding its influence is important. This project aimed to identify the experiences of students with their timetables using questionnaires and focus groups to determine perceptions and relationship to travel to university by ethnicity, gender, age and level of study. Five hundred and fifty students participated across levels 4 to 6 at Kingston University. There was a strong negative correlation between travel time and ‘the timetable works efficiently for me’ (Question 16, National Student Survey). Students from ethnic backgrounds on average were found to travel double the distances of their White counterparts to get to university. In addition, timetable satisfaction was also reflected in the modes of transport used and in perceptions of expected timetabled hours (i.e., whether too many or too few hours scheduled) based on travel times. We identified a number of inclusive priorities to help improve the timetable for student groups including having later starts to days and one guaranteed day free per week. In addition, the COVID-19 world has temporarily reduced the need for most students to commute and can be regarded as a positive disruptor for future commuting students. Certainly, it will be important to find a new balance in applying the identified priorities and the realised alternative COVID-19 teaching practices for creating more inclusive, flexible and blended learning environments to achieve the ultimate student-centred timetable.


Keywords


Timetabling; Commuting; Inclusion; Support; Post-COVID-19

Full Text:

PDF

References


Artess, J., McCulloch, A., Mok, P. (2014) Learning from Futuretrack: studying and living at home. BIS Research Paper 167 London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Available at; https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/learning-from-futuretrack-studying-and-living-at-home

Buckley-Irvine, N. (2017) TEF results – making sense of the London effect. WONKHE. Available at: https://wonkhe.com/blogs/tef-results-making-sense-of-the-london-effect/

Donnelly, M. (2018) Unequal mobilities. WONKHE. Available at: https://wonkhe.com/blogs/unequal-mobilities/

Donnelly, M. & Gamsu, S. (2018) Home and Away. Social, ethnic and spatial inequalities in student mobility. The Sutton Trust. United Kingdom. Available at: https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Home_and_away_FINAL.pdf

Morgan-Tamosunas, R. (2012). Dundee tops THE Student Experience Survey as fees put focus on ‘value for money’. Times Higher Education. United Kingdom. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/dundee- tops-the-student-experience-survey-as-fees-put-focus-on-value-for-money/419771.article

Morris, D. (2018) Students who commute to university are getting a raw deal. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/dec/13/students-who-commute-to-university-are-getting-a-raw-deal

Office for Students. (2020) get the NSS data – Office for Students. Available at: https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/student-information-and-data/national-student-survey-nss/get-the-nss-data/

Page, N. (2018) The 07.03 from Watford High Street to Dr Page’s 9 o’clock lipid lecture. In Evolving molecular bioscience education. Available at: https://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/id/eprint/41262/

Parker, H., Hughes, A., Marsh, C., Ahmed, S., Cannon, J., Taylor-Steeds, E., Jones, L. & Page, N. (2017) Understanding the different challenges facing students in transitioning to university particularly with a focus on ethnicity. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 12, ISSN (online) 2051-3615. DOI: 10.29311/ndtps.v0i12.2450

Southall, J., Wason, H. & Avery B. (2016) Non-traditional, commuter students and their transition to Higher Education - a synthesis of recent literature to enhance understanding of their needs. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 5, 1-15. DOI: 10.7190/seej.v4i1.128

The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2014) What students think of their higher education. Analysis of student submissions to the quality assurance agency for higher education 2012-3. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. United Kingdom. Available at: www.qaa.ac.uk

Thomas, L. (2019) Commuter students in London. London Higher: Supporting Higher Education in London. Available at: https://www.londonhigher.ac.uk/news/report-publication-commuter-students-in-london/

Thomas, L. & Jones, R. (2017) Student engagement in the context of commuter students. The Student Engagement Partnership. London. Available at: https://www.lizthomasassociates.co.uk/projects/2018/Commuter%20student%20engagement.pdf

Webb, O., Wyness, L. & Cotton, D. (2017) Enhancing access, retention, attainment and progression in higher education. A review of the literature showing demonstrable impact. Higher Education Academy. United Kingdom. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/enhancing_access_retention_attainment_and_progression_in_higher_education.pdf

Woodfield, R. & Thomas, L. (2012) Male students: engagement with academic and pastoral support services. Equality Challenge Unit. London. Available at: https://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/external/male-students-engagement-with-academic-and-pastoral-support-services.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i16.3793

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
We use both functional and performance cookies to improve visitor experience. Continue browsing if you are happy to accept cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.
OK


New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences

eISSN: 2051-3615