Email this article Improving Graduate Futures and Employability Through Embedded Industrial Experience
Abstract
The financial cost to individuals of higher education is now regularly exceeding £50k before maintenance in the UK; consequently, students are more concerned than ever that their degree should offer value for money when they enter the jobs marketplace. Overshadowed by long-term debt, lack of career options and job offerings with low salary, student numbers in the arts, languages, humanities and philosophy areas have suffered compared to most STEM disciplines (Universities UK, 2018). Computer science, I.T. and computing tend to buck this trend (HESA, 2020), and, with a drive toward reskilling the workforce for a more technology-focussed future, this suits Government strategy. However, graduate employers want to hire individuals who are well rounded and have experience; businesses identify that more general workplace experience is key.
The subsequent sections describe a level 7 (Master’s) capstone project module, Commercial Development Practice, dedicated to fulfilling these employer requirements by focussing on project processes rather than project products. The practicalities of running this module and considerations that have been key for the successful application of this technique over the 14 years the module has been running are discussed. The curriculum, pedagogic approaches and assessment methods are presented.
The evaluation of this approach, which analyses the impact and student experience and perception of the module using data gathered since 2015, has found that participants gain valuable skills, experience and confidence which leads to more employable graduates.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P. & Unit, S. O. T. Q. R. M. C. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in higher education, 22, 187-203. DOI: 10.1080/03075079712331381034
BCS (2020). Guidelines on Course Accreditation. Available online: https://www.bcs.org/media/1209/accreditation-guidelines.pdf [Accessed 25/04/21]
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32, 347-364. DOI: 10.1007/BF00138871
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20-24.
Connor, A., Karmokar, S. & Whittington, C. (2015). From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for enhancing engineering & technology education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5, 37-47. DOI: 10.3991/IJEP.V5I2.4458
Fincher, S. & Finlay, J. (2016). Computing graduate employability: sharing practice. Project report. Council of Professors and Heads of Computing, Kent, UK. Available online: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/53848/
Forshaw, M., Solaiman, E., McGee, O., Firth, H., Robinson, P. & Emerson, R. (2016). Meeting Graduate Employability Needs through Open-source Collaboration with Industry. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. Memphis, Tennessee, USA: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2839509.2844649
Gordon, N.A. (2010). Group working and peer assessment—using WebPA to encourage student engagement and participation. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 9, 20-31. DOI: 10.11120/ITAL.2010.09010020
Hamilton, M., Carbone, A., Gonsalvez, C. & Jollands, M. (2015) Breakfast with ICT Employers: What do they want to see in our graduates. Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2015), 2015. 30.
HESA. (2017). Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education Longitudinal survey
HESA. (2020). What do HE student study? Available online: https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/what-study#changes [Accessed 25/04/21]
Hribar, M.R. (2005). Sure fire programming: A general framework for independent projects in computer science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21, 257-266.
Joyce, D. & Elliot, S. (2007) Assessed group work: Staff and student perspectives. 20th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (NACCQ), Nelson, New Zealand, 2007.
Kranov, A.A. & Khalaf, K. (2016) Investigating the employment gap: What employers want from engineering graduates. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2016. IEEE, 1198-1201. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942986
McKinnon, S. & McCrae, J. (2012). Closing the gap: preparing computing students for employment through embedding work-related learning in the taught curriculum. Industry and Higher Education, 26, 317-322. DOI: 10.5367/IHE.2012.0106
Pastore, F. (2017) Getting it right: youth employment policy within the EU. CESifo Forum. München: ifo Institut–Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München, München, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, pp. 26-33
Patel, N., Brinkman, W.-P. & Coughlan, J. (2012). Work placements and academic achievement: Undergraduate computing students. Education+ Training, 54, 523-533. DOI: 10.1108/00400911211254299
PRINSLEY, R. T. & BARANYAI, K. 2013. STEM skills in the workforce: what do employers want?, Office of the Chief Scientist.
QAA. (2019a). QAA Subject Benchmark Statements: Computing. Available online: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-computing.pdf?sfvrsn=ef2c881_10 [Accessed 25/04/21]
QAA. (2019b). Subject Benchmark Statements: Computing (Master's). Available online: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/subject-benchmark-statement-computing-(masters).pdf?sfvrsn=15f2c881_10 [Accessed 25/04/21]
Radermacher, A., Walia, G. & Knudson, D. (2014) Investigating the skill gap between graduating students and industry expectations. Companion Proceedings of the 36th international conference on software engineering, 2014. ACM, 291-300. DOI: 10.1145/2591062.2591159
Riebe, L., Girardi, A. & Whitsed, C. (2016). A Systematic Literature Review of Teamwork Pedagogy in Higher Education, Small Group Research, 47(6), pp. 619–664. DOI: 10.1177/1046496416665221.
Sambell, K., Brown, S. & Race, P. (2019). Assessment to Support Student Learning: Eight Challenges for 21st Century Practice. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 11(2).
Thompson, J.B., Edwards, H.M. & Hardy, C.J. (2005). Providing masters level computing students with real-life learning experiences via capstone projects. Information and Communication Technologies and Real-Life Learning. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25997-X_26
UNIVERSITIES UK. (2018) Patterns and trends in UK higher education 2018. Available online: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/facts-and-stats/data-and-analysis/Pages/Patterns-and-trends-in-UK-higher-education-2018.aspx [Accessed 25/04/21].
Wilde, N., White, L.J., Kerr, L.B., Ewing, D.D. & Krueger, E. (2003) Some experiences with evolution and process-focused projects. Proceedings 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, 2003.(CSEE&T 2003). 2003. IEEE, 242-250. DOI: 10.1109/CSEE.2003.1191383.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i17.3596
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
New Directions in the Teaching of Natural Sciences
eISSN: 2753-4138