A Whole-Class Self-Assessment Method to Enhance Engagement with Feedback in Low-stakes, High-value Assessments in the Physical Sciences

David John McGarvey, Laura M Hancock

Abstract


A readily implementable and effective whole-class face-to-face tutor-led student self-assessment method for enhancing engagement with feedback is described and discussed. Key features of the approach are the transfer of responsibility for writing feedback information from teachers to students within a tutor-led face-to-face dialogic feedback session, and students’ self-penned feedback annotations being distinguished from their original work by use of a distinctly coloured pen. Results of a student evaluation are reported and reveal that students perceive this approach as beneficial to their engagement with feedback, their assessment literacy and learning of chemistry.


Keywords


self-assessment; assessment literacy; feedback engagement; feedback recipience; assessment for learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaumont C., O’Doherty M. & Shannon L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning?, Studies in Higher Education, 36, 671–687. DOI: 10.1080/03075071003731135

Blair, A., Wyburn-Powell, A., Goodwin, M. & Shields, S (2014) Can dialogue help to improve feedback on examinations?, Studies in Higher Education, 39,1039-1054. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2013.777404.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Carless D. & Boud D. (2018), ‘The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43, 1315-1325. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.

Chanock, K. (2000) Comments on essays: do students understand what tutors write? Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 95–105. DOI: 10.1080/135625100114984.

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education. A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. DOI: 10.1080/03075079912331379935

Gibbs, G., & C. Simpson. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1, 3–31.

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430. DOI: 10.3102/00346543059004395

Harris, L.R., & Brown, G.T.L. (2013). ‘Opportunities and Obstacles to Consider When Using Peer- and Self-assessment to Improve Student Learning: Case Studies into Teachers’ Implementation.’ Teaching and Teacher Education 36: 101–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008

Higgins, R., Hartley, P. & Skelton, A. (2001) Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback, Teaching in Higher Education, 6, 269–274.

Higher Education Funding Council for England (2017). 2017 National Student Survey Summary Data. Available online at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/2017

(accessed 20th February 2018). DOI: 10.1080/13562510120045230

Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Changing conceptions of feedback. In: David Boud and Elizabeth Molloy, eds. Feedback in Higher and Professional Education. Abingdon: Routledge, 11–33.

Nash, R.A. & Winstone, N.E. (2017) Responsibility-Sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback. Frontiers in Psychology 8, Article 1519. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519

Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.

Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 501–517.

O’Donovan, B., Price, M. & Rust, C. (2004). Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education 9, 325–35. DOI: 10.1080/1356251042000216642

O’Donovan, B.M., den Outer, B., Price, M. & Lloyd, A. (2019). What makes good feedback good?, Studies in Higher Education. DOI:10.1080/03075079.2019.1630812.

Panadero, E., Brown, G.T.L., & Courtney, M.G.R. (2014). Teachers’ reasons for using self-assessment: a survey self-report of Spanish teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 365–383. DOI: 10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5

Panadero, E., Brown, G.T.L., & Strijbos, J.W. (2016). The Future of Student Self-Assessment: a Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803-830. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2

Peterson, E.R., & Irving, S.E. (2008). Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction, 18(3), 238–250. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001

Rand, J. (2017). Misunderstandings and mismatches: The collective disillusionment of written summative assessment feedback. Research in Education, 97, 33-48. DOI: 10.1177/0034523717697519

Smith, C.D., Worsfold, K. ,Davies, L. , Fisher, R. & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students’ assessment literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 44–60. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2011.598636

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018) Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76, 467-281. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Weaver, M.R. (2006). Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 379–394. DOI: 10.1080/02602930500353061

Williams D.P., Lo Fan Hin S., & Erlina (2019). First-Year Undergraduate Student Expectations of two UK Chemistry Degree Programmes. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 14. DOI: 10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.3047

Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Parker, M. & Rowntree, J. (2017a). Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist, 52, 17–37. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017b). It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it’: barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 2026–2041. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032

Yang M. & Carless D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 285–297. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i14.3223

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
We use both functional and performance cookies to improve visitor experience. Continue browsing if you are happy to accept cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.
OK


New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences

eISSN: 2051-3615