Trajectory around planet

Active Learning in Physics, Astronomy and Engineering with NASA’s General Mission Analysis Tool

Nigel Paul Bannister

Abstract


Astrodynamics is the study of the motion of artificial satellites and spacecraft, subject to both natural and artificially induced forces. It combines celestial mechanics, attitude dynamics and aspects of positional astronomy to describe spacecraft motion and enable the planning and analysis of missions. It is of significant interdisciplinary interest with relevance to physics, astronomy and spaceflight engineering, but can be challenging to deliver in an effective, engaging manner because of the often abstract nature of some concepts, the four-dimensional nature of the problems, and the computation required to explore realistic astrodynamics behaviour. The University of Leicester has adopted NASA’s General Mission Analysis Tool as a core resource to support active learning in this subject for students at Level 6 (BSc) and Level 7 (MSc). This paper describes our approach to the implementation of GMAT as an essential element of teaching and learning in the subject.


Keywords


Teaching Practice; Flipped Classroom Teaching;

Full Text:

Case Study - PDF

References


Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J., Aldrich, N.J. and Tenenbaum, H.R., 2011. Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? J. Ed. Psychology, Vol 103(1), Feb 2011, 1-18. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0021017

Acton, C.H., 1996. Ancillary data services of NASA's navigation and ancillary information facility. Planetary and Space Science, 44(1), pp.65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(95)00107-7

Bandecchi, M., Melton, B., Gardini, B. and Ongaro, F., 2000, September. The ESA/ESTEC concurrent design facility. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Systems Engineering Conference, EuSec (Vol. 1, pp. 329-336).

Beshore, E., Sutter, B., Mink, R., Lauretta, D., Moreau, M., Boynton, W., Dworkin, J., Everett, D., Shinohara, C. and Gal-Edd, J., 2015, March. The OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample return mission. In Aerospace Conference, 2015 IEEE (pp. 1-14). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2015.7118989

Biggs, J.B. & Tang, C., 2011. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Bishop, J.L. and Verleger, M.A., 2013, June. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9).

Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bruner, J.S., 1966. Toward a theory of instruction (Vol. 59). Harvard University Press.

Buchberger, B., 1990. Should students learn integration rules? ACM SIGSAM Bulletin, 24(1), pp.10-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/382276.1095228

Cedillo, T. and Kieran, C., 2003. Initiating students into algebra with symbol-manipulating calculators. Computer algebra systems in secondary school mathematics education, pp.219-239.

Chiu, J.L. and Linn, M.C., 2012. Supporting self-monitoring with dynamic visualizations. Metacognition and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp.133-164.

Dori, Y.J. and Belcher, J., 2005. How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students' understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), pp.243-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_3

Falconer, J.L., DeGrazia, J.A.N.E.T., Medlin, J.W. and Holmberg, M., 2009. Using screencasts in ChE courses. Chemical engineering education, 43(4), pp.302-305.

Foster, C., 2013, March. Trajectory Browser: An online tool for interplanetary trajectory analysis and visualization. In Aerospace Conference, 2013 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2013.6497313

Furinghetti, F. and Paola, D., 2003. To Produce Conjectures and to Prove Them within a Dynamic Geometry Environment: A Case Study. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, pp.397-404.

George, L.E. and Kos, L.D., 1998. Interplanetary mission design handbook: Earth-to-Mars mission opportunities and Mars-to-Earth return opportunities 2009-2024. NASA/TM—1998–208533. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19980210557 (accessed 22nd May 2017).

Griffin, M.D. & French, J.R., 1991. Space vehicle design. AIAA Education Series, Washington, DC.

Hoyles, C. and Lagrange, J.B. eds., 2009. Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain: The 17th ICMI Study (Vol. 13). Springer Science & Business Media.

Hughes, S.P., 2016. General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160003520 . Accessed 8th March 2017

Izzo, D., 2010. Global optimization and space pruning for spacecraft trajectory design. Spacecraft Trajectory Optimization, 1, pp.178-200.

Jakosky, B.M., Lin, R.P., Grebowsky, J.M., Luhmann, J.G., Mitchell, D.F., Beutelschies, G., Priser, T., Acuna, M., Andersson, L., Baird, D. and Baker, D., 2015. The Mars atmosphere and volatile evolution (MAVEN) mission. Space Science Reviews, 195(1-4), pp.3-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0139-x

Jonassen, D.H., 1997. Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), pp.65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613

Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. and Clark, R.E., 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), pp.75-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

McGlynn, E., 2007. Introducing gyroscopes quantitatively without putting students into a spin. European Journal of Physics, 28(3), p.479. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/008

Neill, A. and Maguire, T., 2006. An Evaluation of the CAS Pilot Project. Evaluations of the 2005 Secondary Numeracy Pilot Project and the CAS Pilot Project, p.69. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/CAS-Pilot-Project.pdf (accessed 10th March 2017).

Perkins, D.N., 1992. Smart schools—From training memories to training minds. New York: FreePress.

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W.R. and Van der Veen, J.T., 2012. The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), pp.136-153. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017

Sappington, J., Kinsey, K. and Munsayac, K., 2002. Two studies of reading compliance among college students. Teaching of Psychology, 29(4), pp.272-274. doi: 10.1207/S15328023TOP2904_02

Simon, H.A., 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial intelligence, 4(3-4), pp.181-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9521-1_17

Stelzer, T., Gladding, G., Mestre, J.P. and Brookes, D.T., 2009. Comparing the efficacy of multimedia modules with traditional textbooks for learning introductory physics content. American Journal of Physics, 77(2), pp.184-190. doi: 10.1119/1.3028204

Tooley, C.R., Houghton, M.B., Saylor, R.S., Peddie, C., Everett, D.F., Baker, C.L. and Safdie, K.N., 2010. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission and spacecraft design. Space Science Reviews, 150(1-4), pp.23-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-009-9624-4

Vallado, D.A., 2013. Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications (Fourth Edition). Hawthorne CA: Microcosm Press.

Windschitl, M. and Andre, T., 1998. Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), pp.145-160.

Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. and Ross, G., 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17(2), pp.89-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Zhang, Z.H. and Linn, M.C., 2011. Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), pp.1177-1198. doi:10.1002/tea.20443




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29311/jlthe.v1i1.2505

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Nigel Paul Bannister

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
We use both functional and performance cookies to improve visitor experience. Continue browsing if you are happy to accept cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for more information.
OK