Difficulties in Launching Digitization at Museums: The Case of Lithuanian Municipal Museums

Authors

  • Aya Kimura Ochanomizu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v20i2.3610

Keywords:

Digitization, Museum Professionals, Questionnaire, Lithuania

Abstract

Digital technologies are inseparable from museum practices but working on them from scratch has not been well studied. This study explores the difficulties of digitization in 54 Lithuanian municipal museums. The complete questionnaire (N=50) on the targeted museums was conducted in 2017, which aimed to gain empirical data on digitization. Responses to free-text questions in the questionnaire revealed the difficulties of digitization. Faulty equipment, lack of competency, and increased workload were difficulties for personnel; a lack of equipment, personnel, and structural reform due to inadequate funds were institutional challenges. The analysis indicates the first three phases of digitization obstacles in museums: the accomplishment of the minimum requirements, pursuit of quantity, and attempts at better quality.

Author Biography

Aya Kimura, Ochanomizu University

Aya Kimura is a Researcher at Town & Gown Institute of Innovation for the Future, Hiroshima University, Japan. Her primary research interest is in the relationship between museums and technology. Her research field is museums in the Republic of Lithuania and LIMIS (Lithuanian Integral Museum Information System). Besides museum studies, her primary academic interests are digital cultural heritage, cultural policy, and architecture history. She received Ph.D. in Museum Studies from Ochanomizu University (Tokyo, Japan) and a master's degree in Cultural Policy from the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (Tokyo, Japan). She was honored to receive the Lithuanian State Scholarship for short-term study in 2017. 

Downloads

Published

01.11.2022

How to Cite

Kimura, A. (2022). Difficulties in Launching Digitization at Museums: The Case of Lithuanian Municipal Museums. Museum & Society, 20(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v20i2.3610

Issue

Section

Articles