Uses of Oral History in Museums: A Tool for Agonism and Dissonance or Promoting a Linear Narrative?

Authors

  • Anna Cento Bull University of Bath
  • Chris Reynolds Nottingham Trent University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v19i3.3520

Keywords:

Agonism, Oral History, Museums, Northern Ireland, Poland, Contested pasts

Abstract

This paper explores the potential for the deployment of oral history in the museum space to challenge hegemonic narratives on the past and enhance multivocality. Following an overview of the general merits of oral history and debates about its use in museums, we set out the arguments in favour of combining such an approach with the notion of agonistic memory. We then move to a comparative analysis between the Schindler’s Factory exhibition in Krakow and the Voices of 68 project at National Museums NI’s Ulster Museum, Belfast to explore the limitations and benefits of digital storytelling as a tool for disrupting linear narratives. In so doing, this article showcases and explains the potency of combining oral history with agonism in encouraging radical multiperspectivity that takes representations of the past beyond the curtailed benefits engendered by approaches focussed on multivocality alone.

Author Biographies

Anna Cento Bull, University of Bath

Professor of Italian History and Politics 

Chris Reynolds, Nottingham Trent University

Associate Professor for Contemporary French and European Studies

Downloads

Published

11/01/2021

How to Cite

Cento Bull, A., & Reynolds, C. (2021). Uses of Oral History in Museums: A Tool for Agonism and Dissonance or Promoting a Linear Narrative?. Museum & Society, 19(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v19i3.3520

Issue

Section

Articles