International Repatriations of Indigenous Human Remains and Its Complexities: the Australian Experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v18i1.3246

Keywords:

Repatriation of Human Remains

Abstract

In this article, I discuss how returns of Ancestral Remains of Indigenous Australian communities from overseas museums and other scientific institutions since the early 1990s have occurred in the context of changing Australian government repatriation policies and practices. The article then highlights how the past three decades have seen numerous instances of the return of Ancestral Remains to their community proving difficult and stressful because of the loss of ancestral lands, life-ways and the experience of colonial subjugation. As I explain, returning the dead has challenged the living by requiring them to address questions of authority, power and historical legacies of colonialism, notably in the case of those communities seeking the restoration of ownership of their ancestral country within the framework of Australia’s current national and state land laws.

Author Biography

Paul Turnbull, University of Tasmania University of Queensland Australian National University

Paul Turnbull is an emeritus Professor in history at the University of Tasmania, and is an honorary research fellow of the National Centre for Indigenous Studies at the Australian National University. Since the early 1990s, he has acted as a consultant researcher for various Indigenous Australian representative organisations, museums and the Australian Government’s International Repatriation Program. He has written extensively on Western scientific interest in the bodily remains of Australian and other Indigenous peoples and their repatriation. He is the author of Science, Museums and Collecting the Indigenous Dead in Colonial Australia (Palgrave, 2018).

Downloads

Published

23.03.2020

How to Cite

Turnbull, P. (2020). International Repatriations of Indigenous Human Remains and Its Complexities: the Australian Experience. Museum & Society, 18(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v18i1.3246